as media: foundation portfolio

According to the 16-20 female who filled out my contents page feedback sheet, I asked her to add strengths and weakness's of my work (content page).

​

The first point, of the how appropriate the work is to the audience and task, the respondent replied with its fit for the target audience and task.

​

For my conventions of layout and page design question, the respondent replied with the layout is good and easy to follow but to "add in small photos to fit the titles in the righthand section", to improve my magazine i will perhaps look at some smaller images to add to this section perhaps taken at a festival i recently attended for the Reviews section or the win section.

​

The 3rd question relating to Variety in fonts and text size, is a good use of sizes of the text and fonts although "could use varied fonts for artists articles compared to news, reviews and win" to improve my magazine contents page i will look at changing the font style of the other horizontal section focused on artist features.

​

For the 4th area accurate use of language and register the strength was the language is short and captivating but i have made a type error writing the name of one of my inspiration magazines "kerrang", i will change this accordingly.

​

My intergration of Illustration and text, was good, the respondent likes the yellow banner section breakers as they emphasises/highlight the black writing. The even better if was to have "some kind of banner by the artists names by their photos". i will look to change this.

​

The manipulation of photographs as appropriate, including cropping and resizing, saying the editing is strong on the 3 artists at the left side of the page but i should change the madaline massacre image for her poster. Personally i think this was just a taste issue as this was picked as a stronger image for the poster so all not be changing this.

​

​

​

​